Let’s talk about unreliable narrators. I love unreliable narrators. Vladimir Nabokov is a master of the unreliable narrator, a POV character who lulls you into his version of events until you have a moment of, “Wait. Hold on a minute. Say what now?” And suddenly the entire book is cast a whole new light. Lolita is the most famous example, but Pale Fire is the funniest. It is masterful stuff and you should read Pale Fire at the very least. (No judgment if you want to give Lolita a pass).
However, when I see novice writers ask about unreliable narrators in the wild or when I need to try and introduce my own elementary schooler to the concept, my favorite example is the unnamed narrator of Gotye’s 2011 duet with Kimbra, Somebody That I Used to Know. In less than 4:30, you get a fantastic example of an unreliable narrator (and toxic male entitlement) packaged in a banger. And since this is my blog an no one can stop me, we’re going to break it down and discuss why it is so great. So
The song begins with our male narrator signing about the end of a relationship.
Now and then I think of when we were together
Like when you said you felt so happy you could die
Told myself that you were right for me
But felt so lonely in your company
But that was love, and it’s an ache I still remember
He starts out telling us about a relationship that, honestly, doesn’t sound like a grand love affair. He had to convince himself it was a good fit but admits he often felt lonely with her. Though it is always sad when a relationship ends, he seems to recognize this was for the best. How wise! How mature!
He continues:
You can get addicted to a certain kind of sadness
Like resignation to the end, always the end
So when we found that we could not make sense
Well, you said that we would still be friends
But I’ll admit that I was glad it was over
He paints picture of the relationship in the second verse that is even more bleak, of addiction to sadness and resignation. It no longer sounds like just a bad fit, it begins to sound unhealthy. It’s good they broke up. But even in the midst of that, the split was amicable. They are able to “still be friends.” This relationship ending is for the best. He’s even glad it’s over.
Ah, but then we hit the chorus. And things begin to shift.
But you didn’t have to cut me off
Make out like it never happened and that we were nothing
Wait. Didn’t he just tell us they said they would still be friends? But she cut him off and is now acting like they never went out? That’s not friendly.
And I don’t even need your love
But you treat me like a stranger, and that feels so rough
Okay. Now he’s beginning to sound almost petulant. If he doesn’t need her love, why does her treating him like a stranger feel so rough? He’s glad it’s over. He was lonely in her company. He spent the first two verses downplaying the significance of this love affair. This seems like a disproportionate amount of angst over someone he didn’t really seem to…enjoy his time with all that much?
No, you didn’t have to stoop so low
Have your friends collect your records and then change your number
Say what now? She had her friends collect her stuff and changed her phone number? Changing your number is a pain in the ass. It’s not something people generally do on a whim. If you say that you will still be friends, you don’t send your friends to get your stuff. Sending your friends to get your stuff is something you do when a relationship ends badly…or if you don’t feel safe.
I guess that I don’t need that, though
Now you’re just somebody that I used to know
Now you’re just somebody that I used to know
Now you’re just somebody that I used to know
More petulance and soupcon of “the lady doth protest too much.” The tone has shifted. It’s indignant and not nearly as philosophical as the first two verses. His version of events is still plausible but there are now some questions, some loose threads we see upon further inspection.
And then Kimbra comes in:
Now and then I think of all the times you screwed me over
Oh. This is far more direct and a far less flattering portrait of the relationship
But had me believing it was always something that I’d done
Now this. This could be a chapter heading in Lundy Bancrofts seminal work on intimate partner violence, Why Does He Do That. One of the most common themes in stories of IPV is how the victim ends up feeling responsible for their abuser’s bad actions. It is their fault that he did whatever he did. If they had just acted correctly, he wouldn’t have had to.
It didn’t make sense, in his account, why she would have her friends collect her records and change her number, even if she was just being vindictive. But once we have this line, it makes a lot more sense.
And I don’t wanna live that way
Reading into every word you say
Her account becomes more unsettling. She felt like she had to try and interpret every word he said, to the point that it made her life untenable. She’s talking about being in a relationship with someone manipulative, who leaves her on edge, who she feels like she can’t take at face value. Her account also stays consistent, unlike his.
And then, we got the line where his credibility crumbles. Where I feel like the audience should be saying, “Oh Shit! Maybe we can’t trust this guy.”
You said that you could let it go
And I wouldn’t catch you hung up on somebody that you used to know
He has, in fact, spent two verses and a chorus being hung up on someone he used to know. He, himself, has told us how much he didn’t care, how relatively insignificant she and this this relationship was to him and then:
But you didn’t have to cut me off
Make out like it never happened and that we were nothing
And I don’t even need your love
But you treat me like a stranger, and that feels so rough
No, you didn’t have to stoop so low
Have your friends collect your records and then change your number (aah)
I guess that I don’t need that, though
Now you’re just somebody that I used to know
Somebody (I used to know)
Somebody (now you’re just somebody that I used to know)
Somebody (I used to know)
Somebody (now you’re just somebody that I used to know)
I used to know
That I used to know
I used to know
Somebody
He doesn’t care about her, she’s just “somebody that he used to know.” But if she treats him like a stranger, it “feels so rough.” If she sends collect her records, she is “stooping so low.” It’s not about her wanting to feel safe or comfortable, it about what she is doing to him. She isn’t allowed to cut him off. She isn’t allowed to block his calls or avoid him. He wants to be the sole arbitrator of the status of their relationship. It’s over and he still feels entitled to her performing what he feels he’s owed.
Go back and listen to the song again and his account starts to feel even more hollow. More inconsistencies start to appear. Of course, we never know the truth of the song (though I think her side stays pretty solid no matter how many time you listen to it) but by the end of 4:04, I know we can’t trust his.